Whilst being supported under the last BC drivers available with Leopard Install DVD 10.5.6, Apple has decided that there is no need for any further support for Windows x64 on the Macbooks and Macbooks Pro prior to 2008. So no HFS+ read support in Windows for us, then.

Since Microsoft has dumped i386 for its server line and it is pretty clear that Windows 7 is the last 32 bit release from Microsoft, it makes sense to install the 64 bit version now for easier upgrading in the future. Plus you actually get to use the 4GB of ram installed in your machines. So why this retrograde step Apple, particularly as you were trumpeting the virtues of 64 bit processing in your own latest offering? BibleWorks 9.

Whilst being supported under the last BC drivers available with Leopard Install DVD 10.5.6, Apple has decided that there is no need for any further support for Windows x64 on the Macbooks and Macbooks Pro prior to 2008. So no HFS+ read support in Windows for us, then. Since Microsoft has dumped i386 for its server line and it is pretty clear that Windows 7 is the last 32 bit release from Microsoft, it makes sense to install the 64 bit version now for easier upgrading in the future. Plus you actually get to use the 4GB of ram installed in your machines. So why this retrograde step Apple, particularly as you were trumpeting the virtues of 64 bit processing in your own latest offering?

Click to expand.I am honestly pretty upset with Apple over this whole 64-bit issue. We kept hearing about it from Apple. Now it comes time for Snow Leopard, and they refuse to write all the drivers for 64-bit from the last lousy three years! Seriously, it has been three years since the Intel switch, and Apple thinks it's too burdened to care for all of the customers from 2007??? And then all of these 64-bit capable Macs are defaulting to 32 bit Kernel. Maybe Apple didn't come out and say the kernel will be 64-bit in all Macs, BUT WTF??? It's very misleading.

And I don't care that people are saying it doesn't matter, or it's slower. That's because Apple didn't do the work!!! Microsoft is way ahead with tech going forward with Windows 7 64-bit. I know Apple rewrote all the apps in 64-bit, but why not care about the OS itself? 'It doesn't matter' is the favorite saying of everyone defending Apple. Stop defending Apple, they're just trying to sell more Macs! People that have a MB that's three months old need to upgrade to a 13' MBP if they want 64-bit, and there you have the real reason Apple is doing this.

For more sales! Screw the customers! I am honestly pretty upset with Apple over this whole 64-bit issue. We kept hearing about it from Apple. Now it comes time for Snow Leopard, and they refuse to write all the drivers for 64-bit from the last lousy three years! Seriously, it has been three years since the Intel switch, and Apple thinks it's too burdened to care for all of the customers from 2007???

Dec 24, 2011 Hello,Where can I download boot camp 3.0 for windows? I have 3.1 and 3.2 but I need to. BootCamp 3.0 is part of the Snow Leopard installation disk and is.

And then all of these 64-bit capable Macs are defaulting to 32 bit Kernel. Maybe Apple didn't come out and say the kernel will be 64-bit in all Macs, BUT WTF??? It's very misleading. And I don't care that people are saying it doesn't matter, or it's slower. That's because Apple didn't do the work!!! Microsoft is way ahead with tech going forward with Windows 7 64-bit. I know Apple rewrote all the apps in 64-bit, but why not care about the OS itself?

'It doesn't matter' is the favorite saying of everyone defending Apple. Stop defending Apple, they're just trying to sell more Macs! People that have a MB that's three months old need to upgrade to a 13' MBP if they want 64-bit, and there you have the real reason Apple is doing this. For more sales!

Screw the customers! To answer your questions: 64-bit kernel only makes sense if your using 32GB of RAM or more. Donyou know of any Mac that uses more than 32GB oriented at consumers? Pdf Belajar Gitar Terlengkap. Hence makes no sense to give us the 64-bit kernel when the current one can give us support up to 32GB RAM support. Remember even though the kernel can't address more than 3GB, all other applications can; which is the point. So there is no need for 64-bit OS X kernel at the moment.